top of page
Inertia serves as a third-party energy broker for commercial electricity, natural gas, and solar services.
The deregulation of electricity and natural gas in Massachusetts began in the late 1990s and was fully implemented by 1998. Prior to deregulation, the state had a fully regulated market where utilities were responsible for generating and delivering electricity and natural gas to consumers.
The main purpose of deregulation was to introduce competition into the energy market, which was expected to lower prices for consumers and encourage innovation and efficiency in the industry. Under the new system, consumers could choose their electricity and natural gas providers, which created a competitive market for energy suppliers.
The deregulation of electricity was implemented in two phases. The first phase, which began in 1997, allowed large commercial and industrial customers to choose their electricity provider. The second phase, which began in 1998, opened the market to residential customers. This meant that all customers could choose from a variety of energy suppliers, including traditional utilities, independent power producers, and renewable energy providers.
Similarly, the deregulation of natural gas in Massachusetts was implemented in 1997. Under the new system, natural gas suppliers could compete with each other to provide gas to consumers, and utilities were required to separate their distribution and supply functions.
While the deregulation of electricity and natural gas was intended to lower prices and increase competition, it has not always worked out that way in practice. In the years following deregulation, prices for electricity and natural gas increased significantly, leading some to question the effectiveness of deregulation.
One factor that contributed to the rise in prices was the high cost of natural gas, which is used to generate much of the state's electricity. Another factor was the lack of competition in certain areas, which allowed some suppliers to charge higher prices.
Despite these challenges, many consumers have benefited from deregulation by being able to choose their energy suppliers and take advantage of competitive pricing. In addition, the deregulation of energy has encouraged the development of renewable energy sources, which has led to increased investment in wind, solar, and other alternative energy technologies.
Overall, the deregulation of electricity and natural gas in Massachusetts has had both positive and negative effects. While it has created a more competitive market and encouraged innovation in the energy industry, it has also led to higher prices and other challenges. As the state continues to evolve its energy policy, it will be important to consider the lessons learned from deregulation and find ways to ensure that consumers have access to affordable and reliable energy.
Contact us for more information to get set up for cheaper energy you can manage your way!
bottom of page